...they will be who we need when we are old and decrepit. Sorry, it's a fact, we age. But that is not my point.
Does it not make sense for students to work better if they feel valued and full of purpose and meaning? We should teach that. Does it not make sense for students to work better if they feel valued by fellow students
that don't pick on them and wish them dead? We somewhat teach that. Does it not make sense that some students bully because they don't feel valued or hopeful about life? It is a fact. Does it not make sense that all the above are affected by legalizing abortion and not teaching against it in schools along with truthful facts? Exactly. We absolutely do not teach that.
I will do my best to gather the information regarding the processes it would take to get this approved, and effectively widespread. However, those with first-hand knowledge in this area are welcome to help out. We need to creatively find a ways to equip the today's youth with truth and knowledge in a way schools will not shy away from the important issues regarding this. Not just the horrific facts, but interlink it with the bullying issues, and the devastating message it sends our students about mentally/physically disabled or challenged kids. It teaches them that the mentally/physically disabled or challenged kids are a bother and not wanted in this world. Does that seem right? Legalizing abortion in any way, teaches generations that life is less significant and undervalued. If there is a way for a substitute paraprofessional, educator, or community voice to present these cases as a whole where everything is laid down in detail of research, educational enrichment, and student betterment in various aspects with the help of voices who have knowledge in which I may not be able to obtain ("hidden research", testimonial stories, court cases, etc.), I will personally deliver it myself to a couple local schools and see just how far it would be from being approved. If it doesn't work once, that's when try, try, again comes in place. And perhaps others who feel called to this, will step in and present this where they live. I pray that if it works in one or more places, that the domino effect will be put into motion.
By not teaching the value of life and the realities of abortion, schools (whether the school likes it or not) are also giving the message that being sexually active and bullying others is acceptable. We need to present questions like:
[example of open-ended talk at program/curriculum proposal]:
"If a student says to another, 'Your mom should have aborted you!', what would you teachers say?" Any educator would be ashamed to not agree that they would reprimand the student who was being a bully. But wait, how can they say it's wrong, when our country allows it, and we don't even teach against it in schools? They can't. And even if they try, the student will not listen, or take on the belief of such a virtue. Maybe to a respected teacher, but to the system as a whole? No. To an educator who has already voiced their stance on pro-choice? Definitely not. Why would a student respect a reprimand of a bullying comment to an action they believe is fine and dandy? This is just scratching the surface. What if a student says, "Your three month old fetus should have been discarded down a garbage disposal!" Ask the educators, "Is that right?" I sure hope they would say, "No". You ask, "Why?" Should there be a pause, "I'll tell you why. Because this baby is already formed. Not a fetus. The baby has arms, legs, fingers, feet, toes, external ears, head, working circulatory and urinary systems, reproductive organs, can move his/her hands; folks, this is indeed a baby". This bully just totally degraded a student's life and exhibited hatred toward him/her, and showing they didn't even care about who they were when the person was innocent and without guilt in any manner. To branch off a bit, even if a student were to say, "If I could, I would rip your heart out and shred it to pieces!!!" Now in some ways, this is actually less vile than an abortion. Some may object and say, "How so? This has nothing to do with a baby! Er, fetus...someone wrote 'fetus' in the books so that 'makes it' a fetus...the bully is referring to a live person here." Easy to point out, "To be exact, babies are also alive, I don't believe a baby inside a womb makes it dead. But that is not even my main point of correction. The equalizer is: they are both living. The determiner of brutality is: the bully referred to his heart, not him as a whole...abortion consists of damaging much more than a heart. To describe what takes place in an abortion, would be much more descriptive, and savage sounding than the bully saying what he first threatened."
[Implemented Explanations]:
This is just a tiny percentage of pointmakers in how it is important we teach the value of life in our schools, and how not teaching the wrongs of abortion does nothing for raising up well-educated students in our school systems and lowering suicide rates. It is all connected, whether people want to admit it or not. Call a lemon an apple, print it, publish it, get scientist to rename it, but it is, and always will be defined as sour. Call a needle a pillow, print it, publish it, get scientist to rename it, but every time, it will not serve your head well at night as a pillow. So, let's teach our kids the truth: an apple is an apple, a lemon is a lemon, a needle is a needle, and a pillow is indeed a pillow. We tell students to be respectful and kind to those with Down syndrome, but we do not teach against killing a baby because they have Down syndrome. What does that say about our priorities for caring for our students who have Down syndrome? We tell our students to respect and treat all equal; no discrimination. But we do not teach it; we do not defend the value of their lives. Because, apparently their lives are viewed as less if they are dying horrible deaths at invasive human hands because of their extra chromosome. We do not teach it wrong of others to view their lives as a problem, an "unwant", a "failure". If a baby is killed because one leg did not form, and we do not teach it as wrong, what does that tell a former star athlete when a leg is amputated? That he is suddenly nothing without that leg? That we might as well kill him? What does it tell others? That his life is so much more special that that unborn baby? If he were a class A jerk, molester and child pornographer, and the baby was the next Celine Dion with one leg that inspires young girls with disabilities, would we then suddenly change our minds? Suddenly, the living person is the epitome of evil, and the baby is supported by fickle-hearted people? What about Stevie Wonder? Had his mother used her choice to kill him because his eyes did not form in the womb, we would not have him, his music, and his wonderful talent. Is his life any less today than someone else with fully developed eyes? But abortion says: "Yes, yes his life is less". Though I am sure it's obvious he has contributed much more than other normal-eyed human beings. We also would not have his inspiration to others with disabilities that we "cheer on" in life. What exactly do we cheer for? Also, babies are born at less than 3 lbs and live. So, how is that 3 lb baby more of a developed baby than a 5 lb baby? The mother's uterus and belly skin? Obviously not. And truth is, full-developed babies are not just killed, they are gruesomely killed and chucked out. No grave. This is not even touching on the babies born alive, after being tortuously burned in their mother's womb. What next? They could be saved, they are capable of living, but they are then taken to a room and left on a table, dying a painful death...alone. This is legal, and this teaches our youth: murder, disrespect, no regard for human life, that we don't care, that we don't love them, that they are nothing, they are not worth it, etc. Did you see how previous sentence went? Not only did it teach them to do wrong and disregard other human life, but that in turn, are not loved and their lives are not valued. We are just so...disposable.
By not teaching these important lessons and values in schools, outcomes are as effective as verbalized below:
"Quit being so disrespectful; he's a human just like you, but we aren't going to teach you why our country lessens the value of all your lives by allowing well-developed babies to be born more than half-way...only to stick sharp instruments into the base of their neck, suck out their brains, and discard them into trash cans like they are nothing"...
..."Respect a girl when she says 'no' to sex, but should you change your minds and she gets pregnant, but we are not going to teach you to respect the baby she is carrying because that is a 'touchy' subject we are not going to teach you, nor the dangers of her health during abortion, and we won't sympathize if she can never have children ever, or have complications with her bowels because part of it got cut off during an abortion, because this is school and this is an important subject that doesn't fit our curriculum to teach you, but we DO want you to care for others and respect us. James! I am talking! I did you just hear what I said?! Quit trashing Zack's belongings! Why do you kids hurt each other and rebel against authority? I just don't get it. Anyway, as I was saying..."...
..."We are sorry when parents wish you dead, that isn't right, but we won't teach you the value of human life and treasuring your unborn baby just because you cannot see him/her yet by some layers of skin, that way you can treat your kids with the same lack of love that you were taught in home...that way, I can tell your child the same thing when you are just like your father"...
Does it not make sense for students to work better if they feel valued and full of purpose and meaning? We should teach that. Does it not make sense for students to work better if they feel valued by fellow students
that don't pick on them and wish them dead? We somewhat teach that. Does it not make sense that some students bully because they don't feel valued or hopeful about life? It is a fact. Does it not make sense that all the above are affected by legalizing abortion and not teaching against it in schools along with truthful facts? Exactly. We absolutely do not teach that.
I will do my best to gather the information regarding the processes it would take to get this approved, and effectively widespread. However, those with first-hand knowledge in this area are welcome to help out. We need to creatively find a ways to equip the today's youth with truth and knowledge in a way schools will not shy away from the important issues regarding this. Not just the horrific facts, but interlink it with the bullying issues, and the devastating message it sends our students about mentally/physically disabled or challenged kids. It teaches them that the mentally/physically disabled or challenged kids are a bother and not wanted in this world. Does that seem right? Legalizing abortion in any way, teaches generations that life is less significant and undervalued. If there is a way for a substitute paraprofessional, educator, or community voice to present these cases as a whole where everything is laid down in detail of research, educational enrichment, and student betterment in various aspects with the help of voices who have knowledge in which I may not be able to obtain ("hidden research", testimonial stories, court cases, etc.), I will personally deliver it myself to a couple local schools and see just how far it would be from being approved. If it doesn't work once, that's when try, try, again comes in place. And perhaps others who feel called to this, will step in and present this where they live. I pray that if it works in one or more places, that the domino effect will be put into motion.
By not teaching the value of life and the realities of abortion, schools (whether the school likes it or not) are also giving the message that being sexually active and bullying others is acceptable. We need to present questions like:
[example of open-ended talk at program/curriculum proposal]:
"If a student says to another, 'Your mom should have aborted you!', what would you teachers say?" Any educator would be ashamed to not agree that they would reprimand the student who was being a bully. But wait, how can they say it's wrong, when our country allows it, and we don't even teach against it in schools? They can't. And even if they try, the student will not listen, or take on the belief of such a virtue. Maybe to a respected teacher, but to the system as a whole? No. To an educator who has already voiced their stance on pro-choice? Definitely not. Why would a student respect a reprimand of a bullying comment to an action they believe is fine and dandy? This is just scratching the surface. What if a student says, "Your three month old fetus should have been discarded down a garbage disposal!" Ask the educators, "Is that right?" I sure hope they would say, "No". You ask, "Why?" Should there be a pause, "I'll tell you why. Because this baby is already formed. Not a fetus. The baby has arms, legs, fingers, feet, toes, external ears, head, working circulatory and urinary systems, reproductive organs, can move his/her hands; folks, this is indeed a baby". This bully just totally degraded a student's life and exhibited hatred toward him/her, and showing they didn't even care about who they were when the person was innocent and without guilt in any manner. To branch off a bit, even if a student were to say, "If I could, I would rip your heart out and shred it to pieces!!!" Now in some ways, this is actually less vile than an abortion. Some may object and say, "How so? This has nothing to do with a baby! Er, fetus...someone wrote 'fetus' in the books so that 'makes it' a fetus...the bully is referring to a live person here." Easy to point out, "To be exact, babies are also alive, I don't believe a baby inside a womb makes it dead. But that is not even my main point of correction. The equalizer is: they are both living. The determiner of brutality is: the bully referred to his heart, not him as a whole...abortion consists of damaging much more than a heart. To describe what takes place in an abortion, would be much more descriptive, and savage sounding than the bully saying what he first threatened."
[Implemented Explanations]:
This is just a tiny percentage of pointmakers in how it is important we teach the value of life in our schools, and how not teaching the wrongs of abortion does nothing for raising up well-educated students in our school systems and lowering suicide rates. It is all connected, whether people want to admit it or not. Call a lemon an apple, print it, publish it, get scientist to rename it, but it is, and always will be defined as sour. Call a needle a pillow, print it, publish it, get scientist to rename it, but every time, it will not serve your head well at night as a pillow. So, let's teach our kids the truth: an apple is an apple, a lemon is a lemon, a needle is a needle, and a pillow is indeed a pillow. We tell students to be respectful and kind to those with Down syndrome, but we do not teach against killing a baby because they have Down syndrome. What does that say about our priorities for caring for our students who have Down syndrome? We tell our students to respect and treat all equal; no discrimination. But we do not teach it; we do not defend the value of their lives. Because, apparently their lives are viewed as less if they are dying horrible deaths at invasive human hands because of their extra chromosome. We do not teach it wrong of others to view their lives as a problem, an "unwant", a "failure". If a baby is killed because one leg did not form, and we do not teach it as wrong, what does that tell a former star athlete when a leg is amputated? That he is suddenly nothing without that leg? That we might as well kill him? What does it tell others? That his life is so much more special that that unborn baby? If he were a class A jerk, molester and child pornographer, and the baby was the next Celine Dion with one leg that inspires young girls with disabilities, would we then suddenly change our minds? Suddenly, the living person is the epitome of evil, and the baby is supported by fickle-hearted people? What about Stevie Wonder? Had his mother used her choice to kill him because his eyes did not form in the womb, we would not have him, his music, and his wonderful talent. Is his life any less today than someone else with fully developed eyes? But abortion says: "Yes, yes his life is less". Though I am sure it's obvious he has contributed much more than other normal-eyed human beings. We also would not have his inspiration to others with disabilities that we "cheer on" in life. What exactly do we cheer for? Also, babies are born at less than 3 lbs and live. So, how is that 3 lb baby more of a developed baby than a 5 lb baby? The mother's uterus and belly skin? Obviously not. And truth is, full-developed babies are not just killed, they are gruesomely killed and chucked out. No grave. This is not even touching on the babies born alive, after being tortuously burned in their mother's womb. What next? They could be saved, they are capable of living, but they are then taken to a room and left on a table, dying a painful death...alone. This is legal, and this teaches our youth: murder, disrespect, no regard for human life, that we don't care, that we don't love them, that they are nothing, they are not worth it, etc. Did you see how previous sentence went? Not only did it teach them to do wrong and disregard other human life, but that in turn, are not loved and their lives are not valued. We are just so...disposable.
By not teaching these important lessons and values in schools, outcomes are as effective as verbalized below:
"Quit being so disrespectful; he's a human just like you, but we aren't going to teach you why our country lessens the value of all your lives by allowing well-developed babies to be born more than half-way...only to stick sharp instruments into the base of their neck, suck out their brains, and discard them into trash cans like they are nothing"...
..."Respect a girl when she says 'no' to sex, but should you change your minds and she gets pregnant, but we are not going to teach you to respect the baby she is carrying because that is a 'touchy' subject we are not going to teach you, nor the dangers of her health during abortion, and we won't sympathize if she can never have children ever, or have complications with her bowels because part of it got cut off during an abortion, because this is school and this is an important subject that doesn't fit our curriculum to teach you, but we DO want you to care for others and respect us. James! I am talking! I did you just hear what I said?! Quit trashing Zack's belongings! Why do you kids hurt each other and rebel against authority? I just don't get it. Anyway, as I was saying..."...
..."We are sorry when parents wish you dead, that isn't right, but we won't teach you the value of human life and treasuring your unborn baby just because you cannot see him/her yet by some layers of skin, that way you can treat your kids with the same lack of love that you were taught in home...that way, I can tell your child the same thing when you are just like your father"...
RSS Feed